9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 743X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f detailed working sheet in regard to the difference of tax of ₹ 99,14,199.01, as claimed by the Respondent, this Court comes to an irresistible and inescapable conclusion that the impugned notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014 are liable to be interfered with in the interest of justice for the simple reason that there has been a Negation of the principles of natural justice and accordingly, this Court interfere with the said impugned notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014, issued by the Respondent, addressed to the Petitioner and sets aside the same in furtherance of substantial cause of justice. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Writ Petition No. 17856 of 2014 and M. P. (MD) No. 1 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 6-11-2014 - M. Venugo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 10.03.2014 was provided to the Petitioner, by the Respondent. Added further, it is represented on behalf of the Petitioner that till date, the Respondent had not furnished the copy of the web report nor given the detailed working sheet to the Petitioner, notwithstanding the fact that such a request was made by the Petitioner before the Respondent. 5. At this stage, it comes to be known that the Petitioner had addressed a reply dated 19.03.2014 interalia stating that they had calculated the correct sales taxes and paid the same for all financial years and filed the returns also on time and they had also further stated that if there was any difference of tax to be paid by it / Company, the detailed workings of taxability may be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the impugned notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014 are liable to be interfered with in the interest of justice for the simple reason that there has been a Negation of the principles of natural justice and accordingly, this Court interfere with the said impugned notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014, issued by the Respondent, addressed to the Petitioner and sets aside the same in furtherance of substantial cause of justice. Consequently, the Writ Petition succeeds. 8. In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Notices dated 10.03.2014 and 11.07.2014 issued by the Respondent, addressed to the Petitioner, are hereby quashed. Further, liberty is granted to the Respondent to issue a fresh Notice to the Petitioner b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
