9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 991X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Collector, Land Acquisition Anantnag and another Vs MST Katiji and others - [1987 (2) TMI 61 - SUPREME Court] and in N.Balakrishnan Vs M. Krishnamurthy - [1998 (9) TMI 602 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] and the reason stated in the dates and events chart filed by appellant, it does not appeal to the common sense how a litigant could be silent after participation in a proceeding without being for vigila ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ied copy of the Order-in-Appeal. That being provided on 12.1.2012, appellant filed appeal before the Tribunal on 3.2.2012. 2. According to appellant, the reasons stated above has resulted in delay in filing the appeal although that was due to be filed on 14.3.2010 taking into account the date of despatch of the order from the office of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant had no ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ld that delay is condonable unless the impugned order is served on the appellant. 6. We are conscious that any dismissal of appeal at the threshold may turn an meritorious appeal into demeritious. So also the appellant shall be deprived of principles of natural justice. While we appreciate the principle laid down by apex court in Collector, Land Acquisition Anantnag and another Vs MST Katiji an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
