2015 (7) TMI 713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a Sharma, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER After hearing both sides duly represented by Shri Pulak Saha, learned Advocate and Ms. Suchitra Sharma, learned DR, we find that the appellant is engaged in the business of selling its washing machines, dryers, microwave machines and dish washers etc. The appellants are also offering the free warranty for limited period and thereafter undertaking the job o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e initiated against the appellant for the period December, 2003 to March, 2006 by way of issuance of show cause notice dated 9-5-2007 by invoking the longer period of limitation. The said show cause notice was adjudicated by the Additional Commissioner, who held that 20% restriction on availment of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3)(c) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is not applicable to the appellants av .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... elf interpreted the provisions of Rule 6(3)(c), in favour of the assessee is indicative of the fact that said provisions are capable of two interpretations. When one of senior officer of the department is dropping the demand by adopting a particular interpretation of provision of law, the assessee cannot be held guilty of adopting the same interpretation which is in his favour and availing the cre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X