9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (2) TMI 1191X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sed in MACE No. 6/2006 above is still in existence, in ignorance of or contrary to the same, this Court cannot now take cognizance of the matter and hear this appeal on the ground that some substantial question of law is involved. The order passed on 23-8-2006 as indicated herein above operates as Res judicata so far as hearing of this appeal is concerned. That being so, till the order passed on 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed as M.A.C.E. No. 6/2006. It came up for hearing before the Division Bench of this Court on 23-8-2006 when after considering the submissions made, the following orders were passed in the said appeal by a Division Bench of this Court :- Heard Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned Sr. Counsel with Mr. Wakeel Khan, Advocate learned counsel for the appellant. He states that the remedy against the impugned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he appellant to file the writ petition. c.c. as per rules. Thereafter, it is seen that a writ petition was filed before this Court being W.P. No. 2565/2009 and the writ petition was also withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal under Section 35G and now this appeal has been filed. Once the appellant in MACE 6/2006 themselves admitted the position that no appeal under Section 35G was m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
