2012 (2) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER This application filed by the appellant is styled as ROM application. The learned counsel for the appellant particularly refers to para 11 of this application which reads thus : THAT- - - - so far as Case-B is concerned. THERE IS NO DISCUSSION AT ALL, since it is ONLY MENTIONED IN THE OPENING PAGE OF THE ORDER, WITH ABRUPT ENDING AT THE END, even thoug .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted by this Bench. This submission is factually correct as evidenced by Miscellaneous Order Nos. 617 618/2010 dated 22-11-2010. In this scenario, the learned counsel has to fall back upon para 11 of the ROM application. In that para, we have not come across any reference to apparent mistake or error in the Final Order passed by this Bench. 2. Apart from the above, it is also on record that a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X