TMI Blog2013 (8) TMI 891X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pugned order dated 17-6-2013 the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, the CESTAT ) had dismissed the petitioner s application for modification of the earlier order dated 19-3-2013 under which interim stay was granted subject to depositing ₹ 30,00,000/- within ten weeks. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. As could be seen, the petitioner s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is apparent that the impugned order came to be passed without hearing the petitioner. Having regard to the nature of the controversy involved and moreover heavy amounts were directed to be remitted as pre-deposit, in our considered opinion it would be appropriate to provide an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the impugned order is hereby set aside and the Writ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|