2013 (3) TMI 619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ard Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned counsel, appearing for the writ petitioner, and Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents. None has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 6. 2. The petitioner No. 2 has been assessed by the Assessing Officer making the petitioner liable to pay service tax in respect of the execution of some works contract, which the petitioner was allotted by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ade by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, who is the appellate authority. 5. In the above background, the petitioner, now, claims that the ONGC has received a notice, dated 6-2-2013, under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994, from the respondent No. 3 herein for recovery of a sum of ₹ 23,89,097/- (assessed service tax + penalty along with interest) from the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X