9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (2) TMI 486X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d 14-2-2011, passed by the first respondent thereby directing pre-deposit of 50% of the duty drawback and also pre-deposit of 25% of penalties on the appellant, was negatived. 2. It is the case of the appellant firm, which is a Custom House Agency to transact the business relating to import and export under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, that during the course of their business, they ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cond respondent adjudicated the matter and passed an order, dated 14-8-2009, imposing penalty on the appellant firm, against which, the appellant filed appeal before the first respondent along with stay application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of penalty pending disposal of the appeal. It is the further case of the appellant that the first respondent, by a common order dated 14-2-2011, disposed o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the facts and circumstances of the case and also the authorities relied on by both the parties, has given his extensive consideration in the matter, especially in paragraph Nos. 12, 13 and 14 with regard to the relief to be granted by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. In view of the above, the writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed. Connected M.Ps. are close ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
