TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 785X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l [2003 (4) TMI 145 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI] has, as a matter of fact, found that the brand name (Sundar) used by the respondent was his own brand name and it was not the brand name of M/s. S.R. & S. as co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me of M/s. S.R. S. as contended by the Revenue. It is pure finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal and therefore no interference is called for. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. - - Tax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|