Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (9) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dated 08/10/2007. In respect of nine containers (except container IMo.TEXU 3337205) the allegation was that they mis declared the value although the description was found to be correct and in respect of the 10th Container the allegation was that the goods were found to be Crude Vegetable Oil and were also under valued. 2. The ld. AR during hearing merely reiterated the findings in the impugned order even as the appellants citing specifics contended that the inferences/conclusions by the adjudicating authority have been drawn without proper appreciation of the evidence on record. 3. It is seen that the test reports in respect of nine containers categorically found that the goods were correctly declared as vegetable Fatty Acid. These goods .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... import data is not valid for the purpose of valuation in terms of Rules 5 and 6 of valuation Rules 1988 and "no further data pertaining to Rule 7/ 7A was available". Therefore the adjudicating authority went ahead to say that the value is determined under Rule 8 "on the basis of data available in India as discussed in detail in Para 18 to 20 above" which works out to USD 528 PMT CIF. We are unable to fathom as to how this value of US$ 528 PMT CIF has been arrived at as neither the show cause notice nor the adjudication order throws any light as to how under Rule 8 his value has been arrived at. Therefore the determination of the value of the impugned goods contained in nine containers based on the import data of PFAD (which is not the same .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner was adopted on the basis of the Tariff Value for Crude Palm Oleic for which again there is no legal justification as the CRCL report about the contents of the 10th containers no where stated that the goods are Crude Palm Oleic. We also find that the show cause notice alleged that the declared value was U.S.$ 410 Per MT while in fact the value declared by the importers was U.S.$ 420 PMT. The Adjudicating authority has recorded that the goods were found to be odorless, off-white in colour and goods were not of Oman Origin although there is no basis whatsoever cited for recording such findings. None of the laboratory reports stated that the goods were odorless and off-white in colour . Indeed the Adjudication Order suffers from severe inad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates