2012 (10) TMI 999

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal preferred by the Revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the CESTAT, Bangalore Bench dated 11-2-2011 in Final Order No. 112/2011 in Appeal No. E/344/2010. 2. The respondent allegedly defaulted in payment of duty for the months of May and June, 2007 but had paid the same on 24-8-2007 alo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... period and consequently set aside the demand of duty, as the amount was paid along with interest but upheld the penalty imposed. The assessee did not prefer any appeal against the imposition of penalty. 4. The Revenue carried the matter in appeal to the CESTAT against the order of the Commissioner setting aside the demand of duty imposed by the assessing authority/adjudicating authority. 5. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X