9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (4) TMI 1076X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment of additional demand and stay of its recovery proceedings – Joint Commissioner dismissed appeal in default being not maintainable as appellant had failed to comply requirement to deposit additional demand – Held that:- appellant directed to deposit reduced sum as condition precedent for hearing of appeal before Joint Commissioner (Appeals), whereupon, Joint Commissioner (Appeals), shall hear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sessment order along with application for entertainment of appeal without payment of additional demand and stay of its recovery proceedings. The Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad vide order dated July 24, 2007, dismissed the appeal in default being not maintainable as the appellant had failed to comply with the interim order dated May 7, 2007 whereby the appellant was req ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under winding up and ₹ 4,82,480 as directed by the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad, vide order dated May 7, 2007, could not be deposited. It is further submitted that this court may, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, reduce the amount, so that the appellant may comply with it and appeal be heard on merits. 4. On the other hand, learned S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... directed to deposit a sum of ₹ 2 lacs as condition precedent for hearing of the appeal before the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad on or before June 30, 2014, whereupon, the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad shall hear the appeal on merits and in case, the appellant fails to deposit the said sum of ₹ 2 lacs as noticed above, the pre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
