1993 (8) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... igh Court at Madras dated 15th March, 1977, whereby, in a second appeal the concurrent findings of fact of the trial court and the first appellate court were reversed. 2. The plaintiff claimed possession of the properties described in Schedule A to the plaint and joint possession of properties described in Schedules B and C to the plaint. There was no dispute before the High Court and there is no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecreed the suit accordingly. The trial court's judgment was confirmed in appeal by the learned Additional District Judge. The defendant preferred a second appeal to the High Court. Upon a re-appraisal of the evidence on record the High Court came to the conclusion that the plaintiff had not proved that a one-fourth share in the Schedule B properties and a one-half share in the Schedule C prope .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X