9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (8) TMI 1141X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporter or not?NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?NO S.N.AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) C.M. No. 9576/2009 (Exemption) in W.P.(C.) No. 10676/2009 Exemption as prayed for is granted subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C.) No. 10676/2009 and C.M. No. 9575/2009 (for stay) M/s Capital Cargo Carriers (petitioner herein) ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petition has been taken up for final disposal at admission stage itself. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant for the disposal of this writ petition are that the respondent No. 3 being the workman had obtained an award dated 05.05.2005 against the management of M/s Kohli Transport Carriers (P) Ltd. for his reinstatement and back wages. This award obtained by the workman against M/s K ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ss to Kothi No. 1, Khasra No. 695/3, Motia Khan Chowk, Sadar Thana Road, Nabi karim, Delhi. 7. The counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm, of which Mr. Gagandeep Singh Kohli is the sole proprietor. According to the learned counsel, Mr. Gagandeep Singh Kohli was one of the Directors of M/s Kohli Transport Carriers (P) Ltd. and had been ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hareholding. The Directors of the company are not personally liable for the liability owned by a company. The Director, at best, can be prosecuted for non- implementation of the award if it is shown that such a Director was responsible for implementing the award and had deliberately avoided to implement the award. The Directors cannot be held personally liable in financial matters relating to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
