2015 (9) TMI 1270

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tice, i.e., Notice dated 04.05.1994, is concerned, which is for the period between April, 1989, to November, 1992, the CESTAT has rightly held that the said Show Cause Notice was barred by limitation. - Decided against Revenue. - Civil Appeal No. 5119 of 2006 - - - Dated:- 4-9-2015 - Mr. A.k. Sikri and Mr. Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Mr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ued in which excise duty was demanded from the respondent-assessee. After the assessee submitted its reply, demand in respect of three Show Cause Notices were dropped. However, in respect of fourth Show Cause-cum-Demand Notice dated 04.05.1994, the Assessing Authority had passed orders confirming the demand. This happened before the dropping of the Show Cause-cum-Demand Notices in respect of ot .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X