1996 (1) TMI 441

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Gorakhpur passed in Second Appeal No. 1387 of 1986. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the assessee and the Standing Counsel for the respondents. The dispute pertains to the assessment year 198l-82. During that year the assessee dealt in purchase and sales of electrical goods. Upon the rejection of the account books us against the disclosed taxable turnover of ₹ 70,266.69 the taxable turnover .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s one of the reason for which the rejection of the account books was maintained. The gross turnover of purchase disclosed during the year was to the tune of ₹ 6,00,000/- while the purchases from outside the State were shown at ₹ 96,000/-. The learned Counsel for the assessee stressed that first appellate authority had reduced the taxable turnover considering that in the immediately pre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at is expected is that the view which found favour with the inferior authority, should be met by the authority interfering with the order appealed against. The past history of an assessee has always been held to be a relevant consideration in estimating the turnover of a given case. In the instant case the Sales Tax Tribunal has failed to address itself to the consideration which found favour with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X