2015 (10) TMI 674

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... preferring the appeal on the ground that no cause was pointed out for such condonation. The Tribunal also was of the opinion that the adjournment sought for, for the first time, came to be granted and matter was directed to be listed on 30th December, 2013. However, for the second time also adjournment application was preferred by the advocate on record, and therefore, the Tribunal considering the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the order of the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad ( CESTAT for short), the present Tax Appeal is preferred raising the following substantial question of law for our consideration :- Whether the CESTAT committed an error in not considering the reasonable explanation put forth for condonation of delay of 53 days caused in filing the appeal? 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not be delayed further despite the application of adjournment proceeded with the matter and on merit, rejected the same. 5. Before us, it is being pointed out that the adjournment application did speak about ill-health and personal inconvenience of the learned counsel representing the petitioner before the Tribunal. Having found that the application tendered before the Tribunal did explain suff .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X