2015 (10) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... question of law raised. It is open to the appellant to challenge the order dated 26-3-2008 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise in the manner known to law, if so advised. - Decided against Revenue. - C.M.A. Nos. 2181 and 2182 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 28-11-2014 - R. Sudhakar and Mrs. Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JJ. ORDER These appeals are filed by the Department challenging .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rules, 1944, particularly when the finding of the Tribunal is that the process does not amount to manufacture as per Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944? 2. By order dated 16-11-2007, which is under challenge in these appeals, the Tribunal has held that appellant is eligible for the refund of Cenvat credit claimed. 3. The learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that purs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X