2015 (10) TMI 712

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onclusion of the case and passing of an order, it will not be permissible for the Tribunals to pass orders after inordinate delay. - matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - Writ petition No.5666 of 2014 with Civil Application (ST.) No.25877 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 23-3-2015 - B.R. Gavai A.S. Gadkari, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Shah i/b PDS Legal For the Res .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner on 27th September, 2012. However, the impugned order came to be passed on 28th February, 2014. Being aggrieved thereby, the present Petition. 4. The issue is no more res integra. The Apex Court in the catena of judgments has held that an undue delay between conclusion of the arguments and delivery of judgment shakes the confidence of the people in judicial system and affects rights of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... siders important may have escaped notice. But, what is more important is that litigants must have complete confidence in the results of litigation.This confidence tends to be shaken if there is excessive delay between hearing of arguments and delivery of judgments. Justice must not only be done but must manifestly appear to be done. 5. When the Apex Court has held that even in the case of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X