1987 (3) TMI 512

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... were already formulated on 1st July, 1986 on the basis of the documents which were before the detaining authority on that day, viz. documents at serial Nos. 1 to 18 in the list documents supplied to the detenu. It is also not disputed that additional documents were received subsequently in four instalments, viz. documents at a serial Nos. 19 to 24 on 23rd July, 1986, at serial Nos. 25 to 26 on 24 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sis of the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, which satisfaction is to be arrived at by applying mind to all the material available on the record. We thought that it is elementary that the grounds of detention have to be culled from the material in question after considering it together a time. It is only the satisfaction so arrived as which can be considered valid in the eye of l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... clusions, the process indulged in is not of forming a subjective satisfaction but one of finding reasons to support the pre-conceived formulations. That is exactly what the detaining authority has done in the present case. Such an approach can hardly be countenanced. We once again reiterate in as clear terms as is possible for us to do that the grounds of detention have to be formulated and the or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X