9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 861X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ithin two weeks and his conduct is neither culpable nor negligent – Revenue holds that adequate time was granted and Appellant should have deposited the amount – Held That:- Appellant cannot be deprived of his right to seek adjudication on merits as he has deposited the amount of pre-deposit – Appeal allowed in favour of the Appellant. - Service Tax Appeal No.1 of 2015 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 20-1-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oned particularly after taking into consideration extenuating circumstances brought to the notice of the Tribunal and pleaded in the present appeal. Counsel for the appellant further submits that copy of order dated 29.04.2014 was prepared by the registry of the Tribunal on 22.05.2014 and received by the appellant by post on 27.05.2014 i.e. the last date for depositing the amount as directed by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, vide order dated 29.04.2014 directed the appellant to pre-deposit a sum of ₹ 40,000/- within four weeks. A certified copy of the order was prepared on 22.05.2014 and received by the appellant on 27.05.2014. The last date for complying with the order of pre-deposit was 27.05.2014. The appellant deposited ₹ 40,000/- after a delay of 13 days. The appella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
