TMI BlogRebate under Notification 41/2012 ST dated 29.06.2012X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Rebate under Notification 41/2012 ST dated 29.06.2012 X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation. The department has rejected the same on the ground that as per condition specified under Para 1(c) of the notification we have not fulfilled condition to the extent that the difference between rebate as per paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 is less than twenty per cent of the rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 since the difference between Para 2 and 3 is in negative. Fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r example, we have filed rebate claim for ₹ 5000/- as per Para 3 and as per Para 2, the rebate is 3000/-. The department claim is ₹ 3000 - ₹ 5000 is -2000/- (negative number ) Kindly guide us whether the department stand is correct or not? pl help me with any orders, clarifications board circulars case law on the issue Reply By Hariharan Sundaram: The Reply: Dear experts pl cla ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rify my above doubt. Nobody is answering so far. Kindly help me out of the issue. Reply By TAMAN GILL: The Reply: The department calculation seems wrong because as per condition specified under Para 1(c) of the notification Notification 41/2012 ST. For e.g.:- Rebate claim you filed=Rs.5000(as under para 3), Assume Rebate under Para 2 be ₹ 3000, Difference=5000-3000/3000 i.e. 67%...i.e. mor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e than 20%...hence rebate should be sanctioned by para 3 i.e. through documents.Please clarify with the department authorities i would recommend. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|