2015 (10) TMI 1178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appeal against the impugned order dated 26.02.2010. The short issue involved in this case is that the adjudicating authority in the OIO dated 23.07.2009, confirmed the order for recovery of Rs. 21,65,442/- as credit wrongly availed under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules and also demanded interest and imposed penalty of Rs. 2,000/-. The adjudicating authority has denied the credit availed by the res .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n detail to pass clear findings on denial of cenvat credit on input services on various construction activities carried out by them. 3. Revenue in their grounds of appeal stated that the Commissioner (Appeals), the lower appellate authority should not have remanded the case and ought to have passed order on merits and also pleaded that he has not discussed the third issue in his order in respect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o-generation plant in OIO No. 13/2009 dated 02.06.2009. While remanding the case, the appellate authority also clearly stated that the adjudicating authority failed to give due valid grounds for denying credit on other services related to construction activities. No doubt, appellate authority has not discussed the third issue in the impugned order. Therefore, taking into consideration of the overa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X