2015 (10) TMI 1216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ases has been dismissed by this Tribunal. The amount involved in the said case is ₹ 145.50 lakhs and in respect of the remaining three cases, there is neither any stay for recovery nor any other details submitted by the appellant on the stay application that has been filed anywhere. It was further informed that the amount recovered ₹ 36.58 lakhs is against the recoverable amount of  .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Excise duty amount as required under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was thereafter issued show cause notice dated 10/03/2015. Thereafter a reminder was sent on 23/04/2015 and the case was posted for hearing on 18/05/2015. This was again adjourned to today. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant's contention was that their bank account was attached by the depart .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... there is neither any stay for recovery nor any other details submitted by the appellant on the stay application that has been filed anywhere. It was further informed that the amount recovered ₹ 36.58 lakhs is against the recoverable amount of ₹ 151.87 lakhs involved in other four cases. Further, as far as the present appeal is concerned, no amount has been appropriated for the simple r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X