2006 (5) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de - Appeal No. C/51/2006-NB(SM) - Final Order No. 1076/2006-NB(SM)-BR - Dated:- 22-5-2006 - Heard both sides. 2. Appellant filed this appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, whereby the goods imported by the appellants were confiscated and ordered to be released on redemption fine and personal penalty was imposed. 3. The brief facts of the case are that appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tention to violate the prohibition imposed by the Public Notice, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable. 5. Appellant also contended that the Commissioner of Customs in the impugned order held that the contention raised by the appellant's appeal be genuine and correct. Therefore, all the confiscation is not sustainable. 6. The contention of the Revenue is that goods were imported in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X