2015 (10) TMI 1578

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... amble, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER What is impugned in the present petition is a letter demanding payment of interest. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has already paid the Service Tax liability for the period post-1-5-2006. 2. It is the contention of Shri Jetly that, in view of the judgment of the learned CESTAT at Mumbai in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rusal of the communication at page 36 would reveal that a meeting was held between the representatives of the Indian Banks' Association and one Mr. M.R.R. Reddy, Addl. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai. Perusal thereof would also reveal that entire arrangement of credit card business was explained to Mr. Reddy. It was however suggested by Mr. Reddy that due to complexity of the matter, a represen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng and Legislature, Government of India. 6. It further appears that demand is also made by the Respondent No. 2 for further period and accordingly payment has been made by the petitioner under protest. 7. It is the case of the petitioner that the acquiring Bank has paid the entire Service Tax payable on the transactions. It is further the case of the petitioner that though the petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X