9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 2185X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he order passed under Section 220(6), the Assessing Officer was likely to review the conditional order, the appellant apprehends that some more levy may be imposed. The above grievance of the appellant could easily be redressed. As against the original assessment completed on 28.5.2014, the appellant did not go on appeal. They have accepted all the disallowances. Now, what is pending in appeal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d Appellate Authorities of the Department of Income Tax to stay the disputed outstanding demand of ₹ 10 crores pursuant to an order dated 28.1.2015 passed under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Heard Mr.R.Venkataraman, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. The assessment in the cas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mplied with the said conditional order. But, in the order under Section 220(6), the Assessing Officer also stated that if the appeal is not disposed of on or before 30.9.2015, the matter may be taken up for review. 4. Without challenging the order of the Assessing Officer dated 28.1.2015 by filing the statutory appeal, the appellant filed a writ petition in W.P.No.3145 of 2015 simply seeking a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e State Bank of India in proof of having made payment of ₹ 5 Crores as per the order dated 28.1.2015. 6. Today, the grievance of the appellant is confined only to one thing. Since the regular appeal is not yet disposed of and since by the order passed under Section 220(6), the Assessing Officer was likely to review the conditional order, the appellant apprehends that some more levy may be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
