9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (11) TMI 349X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... U.S. Prasad JUDGMENT: The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. Special leave granted. The order dated 25th March, 1988 of the Collector is under challenge in this appeal. The same reads as follows: "Shri Raghu Nath Thakur S/o Late Gorakh Thakur, Village Repura, P.S. Puksha, District Samastipur had bid for ₹ 11,900 (Rupees eleven thousands only) per month Da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant of the proposal of black-listing the appellant. It was contended on behalf of the State Government that there was no requirement in the rule of giving any prior notice before black-listing any person. In so far as the contention that there is no requirement specifically of giving any notice is concerned, the respondent is right. But it is an implied principle of the rule of law that any ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lector is set aside. So far as the cancellation of the bid of the appellant is concerned, that is not affected. This order will, however, not prevent the State Government or the appropriate authorities from taking any future steps for blacklisting the appellant if the Government is so entitled to do so in accordance with law, i.e. giving the appellant due notice and an opportunity of making repres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
