TMI Blog2015 (11) TMI 565X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner : Shri Karan Sachdeva, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R. Khanna, DR ORDER Per: Justice G. Raghuram: Appeal is preferred against the order dated 31.12.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Jaipur-II whereby the appeal preferred by the appellant/ assessee was rejected. The primary assessment order confirmed service tax for the period 2008-09 to 2009-1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 01.05.2011 in view of the amendment to Section 65(25a) of the Act. In the amended definition service provided to non-members was brought within the scope of the taxable service. 3. In respect of services provided to the appellant's members, the issue is fully covered by the decision of this Tribunal in Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry vs. CST, Delhi - 2015 (38) STR 529 (Tri. D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|