2006 (11) TMI 43

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . E/5883/2004-SM - Final Order No. 1682/2006-SM(BR)(PB), - Dated:- 13-11-2006 - [Order]. - When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the Respondent. The notice was issued to the respondent and were received back with the postal remarks ''factory closed". 2.Revenue filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby the appeal filed by the respondent was allowed and demand under Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt of the price of the goods which has been paid under Rule 57CC of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 by the respondents. Therefore, there is no violation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act. The copies of invoices which were reproduced in the order specifically mentioned the amount of excise duty. The amount of excise duty was charged separately from the customers in addition to the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X