TMI Blog2002 (4) TMI 950X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... accident on 12.12.1988, is directed against the judgment rendered by a division bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh reviewing order dated 9.8.1999 and reducing the compensation awarded in favour of the appellants. 3. Shorn of unnecessary details, relevant facts leading to the present proceeding may be stated thus: The accident occurred due to a collision between the bus owned by the A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filing of the claim petition. Still not satisfied with the amount awarded the appellants preferred letters patent appeal No. 176 of 1999, which was decided by the division bench vide the judgment dated 9.8.1999. The division bench further enhanced the compensation amount to ₹ 2,55,000/- with 12% interest. Thereafter, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited-respondent No. 2 herein, sought rev ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a review petition is that the order, review of which is sought, suffers from any error apparent on the face of the order and permitting the order to stand will lead to failure of justice. In the absence of any such error, finality attached to the judgment/order cannot be disturbed. 5. Coming to the merits of the case, suffice it to say that on perusal of the order, which has been reviewed by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|