9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (3) TMI 741X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 77 of Finance Act, 1994 to the tune of ₹ 35,450 and ₹ 9,000 respectively. 2. Ld. DR submitted that like all other assessees, respondent should be equally dealt under the law and breach of law should be seriously viewed. Mere discharge of the tax amount shall not exonerate the respondent from penal consequence of law. Ld. DR cited Larger Bench decision in the case of Eta Engg. Ltd. v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondent had co-operated to revenue, co-operative attitude and for the findings of the lower appellate authority that Department hesitated to issue registration to the respondent, the matter was under confusion as to determination of liability. 4. Heard both sides. There is no difference of opinion about realization of levy from the respondent in view of incidence of the levy by specific lett ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Finance Act, 1994, exonerates penalty, if there is reasonable cause. The Larger Bench s decision cited by the revenue, supports such proposition in terms of para 8 of the reported order. The reason cited by the lower appellate authority appears to be appealable reason and does not call for imposition of penalty. 6. The lower appellate authority appears to have passed a reasoned and speaking or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
