TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 882X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Adv. For The Respondent : Mr Mohd Yusuf, AR Per: B S V Murthy: Even though only one appeal has been listed for consideration today, the learned counsel submits that the order-in-appeal deals with 8 claims which were dealt with, in 8 orders-in-original. She submits that in all the cases the issues involved are the same. Therefore she submits that the Tribunal may pass a common order rather than ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he refund claims have been rejected on the ground that the services did not have nexus with the authorized operations and therefore it cannot be said that they were used in the authorized operations. Even though the services in respect of which refund of tax paid has been claimed were in the list of approved services by the Approval Committee, in the absence of use of the same for specified purpos ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unsel submitted that the very same issues had been considered by the Tribunal and this Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 20664-20665/2015 dated 10.03.2015 in respect of the very same appellant had allowed the appeals with consequential relief. The learned AR also agrees that the issues involved were same. 5. While rendering the decision in favour of the appellant in that case, the Tribunal had relie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|