9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (6) TMI 971X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... : Mr. R. Selvakumar For the Respondent : Mr. A.P. Srinivas JUDGMENT SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. Mr. A.P. Srinivas, learned counsel, accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The instant intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 30.10.2014 passed in W.P.M.P. No.162 of 2012 in W.P. No.1244 of 2001, wherein, the application for restoration of the disposed of W.P. No.1244 of 2001, was rej ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ttee consisting of representatives from the Ministry of Industry, the Bureau of Public Enterprises and the Ministry of Law, to monitor disputes between Ministry and Ministry of Government of India, Ministry and public sector undertakings of the Government of India and public sector undertakings in between themselves, to ensure that no litigation comes to court or to a tribunal without the matter h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stored to its file. 6. The learned Single Judge considered all the aspects of the matter before coming to the conclusion that once a petition has been decided finally, the same cannot be restored or re-heard on the ground of subsequent pronouncements of law on the subject. 7. We have examined the entire facets of the case. On a perusal of the earlier order dated 12.12.2009 passed in W.P. N ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a decision in Electronics Corporation of India (supra).
9. Thus, at this stage, the disposed of writ petition cannot be revived or restored to its file, as pleaded by the learned counsel for the appellant. The order sought to be impugned in this writ appeal is just and proper, warranting no interference.
10. Resultantly, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
