TMI Blog2013 (5) TMI 848X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this writ petition is the recovery notice dated 14-2-2012 (Annex. 9) whereby petitioner has been asked to deposit the dues of ₹ 1,02,193/- (37,259/- as Excise duty and ₹ 64,934/- as penalty) along with interest. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that admittedly dues of Exci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ision enumerated in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the respondents are entitled to recover the said amount from petitioner also. 5. Be that as it may. 6. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties agreed that liberty may be given to the petitioner to make a representation to respondent-Department against recovery notice dated 14-2-2012 and the respondent-De ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|