2015 (5) TMI 993

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nterregnum. It is necessary, in the circumstances, that samples be drawn in the presence of the petitioner’s representative to ascertain from the Central Food Laboratory, Kolkata as to whether the goods are still fit for human consumption. It is proposed that the goods may be released to the petitioner upon the same being found to be fit for human consumption and after obtaining sufficient guarant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sample Analysis) Regulations, 2011, the test could not have been conducted at the Mysore laboratory. The third sample was drawn in the presence of the petitioner and at the behest of the petitioner. The result vindicated the petitioner s stand. 3. It is nearly 18 months that the goods have remained in a limbo. Even if the food articles - the petitioner says that they are betel nuts - were origi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... from date upon notice to the petitioner. 4. Affidavit-in-opposition be filed within one week after the reopening of Court following the summer vacation; reply thereto, if any, may be filed within four days thereafter. 5. The petition will appear as the last Motion on June 16, 2015. 6. The petitioner will not be required to make the payment in terms of the order impugned dated March 15, 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X