Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (2) TMI 1120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Respondent: Shri M S Reddy Deputy Commissioner (A.R) JUDGEMENT Per: Anil Choudhary: The appellants and Revenue are both in Appeal, against Order-in-Appeal No. 56 & 57 (CRC-I)/2011 (JNCH) IMP-38 & 39 dt. 09.02.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), JNCH, Mumbai-II. 2. The brief facts are that the assessee -importers imported 4 consignments of poppy seeds and filed Bill of Entry No. 662776 dt. 8.12.2000 Bill of Entry No. 662777 dt. 8.12.2000, and Bill of Entry Nos. 662784 & 663451 dt. 18.12.2000. The invoice on transaction value was rejected and the consignment was assessed provisionally under Section 18 at US$ 1200 PMT CIF instead of transaction value being US$ 850 PMT. The assessee made payment of differential duty .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 26.04.2007, filed appeals before this Tribunal. The said appeals were rejected by this Tribunal vide Order No. 344-345/WZB/MUM/2008/SMB/C-II dt. 1.2.2008 and 13.3.2008. In the meantime, the Revenue granted refund of ₹ 7,17,600/- on or about 1.1.2008 without granting interest of the refunded amount. The assessee being aggrieved for non grant of interest, again appealed before Commissioner (Appeals), who vide the impugned order dt. 9.2.2011 was pleased to hold that the appellant is entitled to interest on the refunded amount from a date three months after 26.4.2007, to date of payment of refund, i.e. on or about 1.1.2008. 3. The Revenue is in the appeal against grant of interest by the Commissioner (Appeal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mmissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai 2009 (241) ELT 227 (Tri-Mum) wherein it was held that cause of refund arises only as a consequence of quasi-judicial order. The appellant further relied on the provisions of Section 18 read with sub-section 3 & which provides that when the duty leviable on such goods is assessed finally or re-assessed by the proper officer and where the goods are cleared for home consumption or exportation, the amount paid shall be adjusted against the duty finally assessed or reassessed, as the case may be, the importer or the exporter of the goods shall pay the deficiency and/or be entitled to a refund, as the case. Sub-section (3) further provides that the importer/exporter shall be liable to pay interest, on any a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... allowed to the assessee as specified in Section 27A of the Act, and the Rules and/or notified by the Central Government. His prayer for commercial interest is rejected as this Tribunal cannot grant interest is rejected as this Tribunal cannot grant interest more than the rate prescribed under the Rules. I further direct the concerned officer to grant amount of interest within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of this order without any formal claim from the assessee and to file compliance report before this Tribunal. The assessee is granted liberty to meet the concerned officer with the copy of this order for needful. 7. Consequently appeal Nos. C/257 & 258/2011-Mum by Revenue are dismissed.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates