2007 (6) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nly demanded Rs.85 lakh instead of total amount of duty - Application dismissed on the ground that respondent has no locus standi
[Order per P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - This application was filed by one Shri K. Divakar for impleadment as respondent in Appeal Nos. E/133- 142/07 and in the stay applications filed therein by the appellants. The affidavit of the applicant says that it was he who ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Commissioner and that he did not apply to the adjudicating authority for getting impleaded as a party to the proceedings. He was not one of the noticees in the show-cause notice issued by the department. If his present averments are to be believed, he is only a witness at best. As rightly pointed out counsel and SDR, Shri K. Divakar has no locus standi to claim to be impleaded as respondent in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X