2013 (11) TMI 1613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i V.P. Batra, Authorized Representative (DR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides we find that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Shoddy woollen yarn and synthetic shoddy yarn of Chapter sub-heading 5106.11 and 5509.90 of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 2. The proceedings were initiated against the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d by the original Adjudicating Authority who by adopting assessable value as 115% cost of the goods confirmed the duty of ₹ 5,04,359/- and also imposed penalty of identical amount. 3. On appeal against the above order, Commissioner (Appeals), called for a verification report from the Superintendent and observed that if the invoice value in different varieties of the yarn is taken into .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue is not justified. 5. In any case and in any view of the matter we note that the yarn being cleared by the appellant was further being used captively by the buyers units, after availing the Cenvat credit whatever duty was payable by the appellant, the same was availed as credit by the buyer units, thus leading to Revenue neutral situation. As such, on this ground also we feel that the appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X