9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (2) TMI 322X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- We are prima facie of the opinion that if no protection is granted, the petitioner would suffer irreparable loss. We may recall that the first of the demand notices was issued on 29.11.2013. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat, till further orders, therefore, shall not proceed with the hearing in connection with the said demand notices. - Interim relief granted. - S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner, therefore, had applied to the Customs authorities for extension period of warehousing of goods. Such application dated 15.05.2013 has not yet been decided by the Chief Commissioner. In the meantime, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat issued demand notices for recovery of customs duties with interests. First such notice was issued on 29.11.2013. However, in view of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rate, when the request of the petitioner for extension of time is still pending, recovery of the duties would not be permissible. Counsel drew our attention to the circulars of CBEC suggesting that in cases were the manufacture of goods is likely to take longer time, request of extension of time should be granted. 3. Issues require consideration. 4. Let there be NOTICE returnable on 04.02.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
