2016 (4) TMI 239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant : Mr Hari Radhakrishnan For the Respondent : Mr V Sundareswaran, SPC JUDGMENT These appeals arise out of an order directing the appellant/assessee to make a pre-deposit and a consequential order dismissing the appeal for non compliance with the order for making pre-deposit. 2. Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he appellant has filed two appeals, one against the order for pre-deposit and another against the consequential order of dismissal of the appeal. The appellant also filed a petition for condonation of delay, which was allowed by this Court. 6. It is contended by Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant that the case of the appellant is squarely covered by a final order passed by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... extension of time or at least filed an appeal against the said order. Neither within the time stipulated by the Tribunal nor after the time fixed, the appellant filed any appeal. As a consequence, the order dismissing the appeal came to be passed long after on 30.6.2015. 9. Once a consequential order is passed, the appellant would have no cause of action as against the original order. Consequentl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X