9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (4) TMI 168X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 09 of 2007 & Others - - - Dated:- 18-4-2007 - [Order per] - P.C. Perused all Petitions. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties appearing in all these petitions. 2. By these petitions the Petitioners are challenging the orders dated 28th March, 2005 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Textile Committee Cess Appellate Tribunal in the Appeals preferred by the Petitioners against the deman ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s Chowdhury v. State of West Bengal - AIR 1972 SC 2060 held that "it is imperative, if the petitioner wants to invoke extraordinary remedy available; under Article 226 of the Constitution that he should come to the Court at the reasonable possible opportunity." In J.N. Maltiar v. State of Bihar - AIR 1973 SC 1343, Apex Court held that where the petitioner was informed that his service was termi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ustified in doing so several years after the appointment. In Hari Singh v. State of U.P. - AIR 1984 SC 1020, where there was a delay of two and half years, from the date of publication of the notification under Sections 4 and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, the petition was rejected on the ground of laches. In Abhinavodhanarda Villya Sankara Vihari v. P.R. Reddy - AIR 1986 SC 1511, wher ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
