9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (3) TMI 1021X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s to direct the present appellant to make payment of statutory interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the Act') for the acquisition of the land in terms of the award No.3/1997-98 dated 10.12.1997. The appellant resisted the claim on the ground that such a prayer cannot be accepted in the writ petitions. The High Court, however, held that the writ applications were to be allowed. Accordingly, it directed the respondents in the writ petitions including the present appellant to pay the interest payable to the claimants in terms of Section 34 of the Act and pay costs of ₹ 10,000/- . 3. In support of the appeals, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the direction given by the High Court is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aid or deposited on or before taking possession of the land, the Collector shall pay the amount awarded with interest thereon at the rate of nine per centum per annum from the time of so taking possession until it shall have been so paid or deposited. (Provided that if such compensation or any part thereof is not paid or deposited within a period of one year from the date on which possession is taken, interest at the rate of 15% per annum shall be payable from that date of expiry of the said period of one year on the amount of compensation or part thereof which has not been paid or deposited before the date of such expiry. 7. There is no dispute that apart from Sections 28 and 34 which deal with payment of interest to persons entitled ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ole to play in determination of the compensation and the manner of awarding interest as enjoined under the Act. The same has to be administered in the manner laid in the Act and in no other way. As a concomitance, the equity jurisdiction of the court is taken out and the Act enjoins the Court to grant interest as per the statutory rates specified in the Act. A plea was taken in a case before this Court in a matter relating to Jammu and Kashmir Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1968 which omitted provision for payment of solatium and interest, that in spite of the absence of the provision for solatium and interest in the said Act, the State was bound to pay solatium and interest to the land owners on equitable grounds ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
