TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 515X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is found that the time limit to file refund application was extended vide Notification No. 32/2008 dated 18.11.2008. The claim pertains to the quarter 1.10.2007 to 31.12.2007 and the time limit upto 18.11.2008 was only two month for filing refund claim. It got extended to 6 months vide Notification No. 32/2008 dated 18.11.2008 but by the time this notification was issued, more than 6 months had e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n for the Tribunal to enquire into the merits of the issue….”. Accordingly, we refrain from discussion the merits of this case. - Decided against the appellant X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntioned at Serial No. (1) to (2) above have been held to be invalid and untenable in the case of Shivam Exports by CESTAT vide Final Order No. ST/A/53916-53918/2016 dated 26.11.2015. 3. Regarding transportation of goods from factory to the port, the Ld. Consultants only contention is that when transportation from ICD to port is covered under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, the transportation from t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ued, more than 6 months had elapsed from the end of the said quarter. Indeed, had the refund pertained to the quarter ending 30.06.2008, the said extended time limit would have come to the assessee's rescue because six months period (from 30.06.2008) would not have elapsed before the date on which the time limit got extended (on 18.11.2008) which would have enabled the refund claim filed upto 30.1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|