2015 (8) TMI 1291

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant. Dr. J. Nagori, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : P.K. Das, Member (J)]. - In view of the conflict of opinion of two Larger Benches, (both consisting of the Hon'ble three Members of the Tribunal), in the case of CCE, Ahmedabad v. Arvind Mills Ltd. - 2006 (204) E.L.T. 570 (Tri.-LB) and Lucas TVS Ltd. v. CCE, Chennai - 2009 (233) E.L.T. 192 (Tri.-LB), the lear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the fact whether the buyer actually availed or not. In view of the decision of the Larger Bench, the appellant stopped payment of duty, even the cash discount was not availed by the buyers. Show cause notices were issued, proposing differential duty along with interest and to impose penalty, on amount of the cash discounts, which was not actually passed on to the buyer during the period November .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s TVS Ltd. (supra). It may be, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Pune v. SKF India Ltd. - 2009 (239) E.L.T. 385 (S.C.), there is no need for reference of constituting a five Member Bench as per order of Lucas TVS Ltd. (supra). The learned Advocate further submits that in the present appeal, the appellant is entitled to get the relief, insofar as the demand of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X