Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (11) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the category of advertising agency
Justice R.K. Abichandani, President [Order].- 1. The appellant, a sole proprietary concern, has challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) made on 31-10-2006 upholding the order-in-original, whereby demand of Service Tax of Rs.1,23,821/- was confirmed with penalty of the like amount under Section 76 of the Act and again a penalty of the like amount under Section 78 of the Act. 2. According to the Revenue, the appellant was a commercial concern engaged in providing services connected with making preparation, display and exhibition of advertisements and also providing consultancy in advertisements. During the scrutiny of the records of M/s. Mangalam Cement Ltd., it was noticed that, from 1-1-20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he dictionary meaning of 'display', found that, the appellant had rendered services of advertisement to M/s. Mangalam Cement Ltd. and that there was no infirmity in the order of the adjudicating authority. 5. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant contended that, the appellant was only a painter and painting the advertisement material on the roadside walls, shutters etc. and that such material was provided by the advertiser. The appellant was only deputed for wall painting by Mangalam Cement Ltd. and was paid on sq. ft. basis for the labour work done by him. It was submitted that, the words 'Dhanshree Publicity' were not Conclusive for holding that the appellant was providing services of 'advertising agency' .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... agents'. He also relied upon the decision in the case of Ajanta Fabrication v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut reported in 2006 (4) S.T.R. 605, in which it was held that, alien and unconnected services for manufacturing activity cannot be brought within the scheme of levy of service tax on advertising services. In that case, hoardings and sign boards were made, but the design, colour, scheme etc. were provided by the State Tourism authority. 6. The learned authorjsed representative for the Department, on the other hand, argued that, the name of the appellant 'Dhanshree Publicity' was suggestive of the work done by it. He submitted that business name 'Dhanshree Publicity', adopted by the appellant, which was also .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es rendered with reference to the advertisement It was submitted that, even in the present case, the services rendered by the appellant were with reference to the advertisement and it was immaterial as to who supplied the matter, design etc., which was required to be advertised. He submitted that, even if the site was provided by Mangalam Cement Ltd. by directing the appellant to go to the dealers'/stockists' premises, the appellant was required to visualize as to the manner in which he should prepare the painting of the advertisement which was to be displayed. He submitted that, any different view would result in redundancy of the provisions. 7. The facts are in a narrow compass. The material on record establishes that the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lling in the category of 'advertising agency'. A mere painter would not be concerned with the purpose for which the painting is done. His job, in a case like this, would be only to use his personal skill by painting whatever material is given to him at the site, which is also provided to him. There are even way side painters who would, for an amount, quickly paint out advertisements for anyone who engages them. They would surely not become an 'advertising agency'. Mere menial expertise of painting will not drag the artist into the net of taxable service of 'advertising agent'. Therefore, something more is required than mere earning of livelihood by use of the artistic talent of painting by the person who is engaged a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rvices did not partake or include the services (designing, conceptualizing, visualizing) normally rendered by advertising agencies. Even in Zodiac Advertisers v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin (supra), it was held that, making and preparation of the advertisement was the most important and difficult part as it involved conceptualization, visualization and designing. The printed material was only a product. Therefore, where mere screen printing was undertaken, it was held that, there was no creative activity. Mere manufacturing the product as per the instructions and specifications of the job work would not amount to rendering the service which can fall in the category of 'advertising agency'. 9. In the present case, all the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates