9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (9) TMI 663X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... directed against the order made by High Court of Madras dated 7,4.1994 in Review C.M.P. Nos. 44 and 45 of 1994 in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 4974 and 4975 of 1983, The Rent Controller ordered eviction of the appellants in an eviction petition filed by respondents 1 and 2 on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and bonafide requirement of the premises by respondents 1 and 2 for their o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issed on 16.9.1987, After the dismissal of the special leave petitions by this court, the respondents filed review petitions No. CMP 44 and 45 of 1994 in the High Court seeking review of the order, dismissing civil revision petitions No. 4974 and 4975 of 1983 on 7.1.1987. It was the order dated 7.1.1987 (supra) which was the subject matter of challenge in SLP(C) Nos. 4039-4040/87. There was also a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ies, to say the least, was not proper. Interference by the learned single Judge at that stage is subversive of judicial discipline. The High Court was aware that SLPs against the orders dated 7.1.87 had already been dismissed by this court. This High Court, therefore, had no power or jurisdiction to review the self same order, which was the subject matter of challenge in the SLPs in this court aft ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cate the manner in which the review petitions were filed and heard in the High Court after the dismissal of the SLPs by this court. The appeals deserve to succeed on that short ground. The appeals are, consequently, allowed and the impugned order dated 7.4.1994 passed in the review petitions is hereby set aside. The respondents shall pay ₹ 10,000 as costs. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
