9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 631X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ss Auxiliary Service . Both these demands, for the period 16-7-2001 to 30-9-2005, are under the proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994, in adjudication of a show-cause notice, wherein it was inter alia alleged that a major part of the services had been rendered by the appellants as sub-contractors of M/s. South India Corporation Ltd., M/s. Sea Port Logistics Ltd., M/s. SICAL Logistics etc. It appears from the records that there are 9 agencies (including the said 3 parties) who employed the appellants as sub-contractors for rendering services in the Chennai port area. The rest of the demand of tax is on Port Services directly rendered by the appellants to their clients in the port area. This demand apparently works out to over & ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion Ltd., M/s. Sea Port Logistics Ltd. and M/s. SICAL Logistics, have been placed on record by counsel. Learned Counsel has also referred to para 11.5 of the impugned order in his endeavour to establish that there can be no demand on the appellants (sub-contractors) when Service Tax on the same services has been demanded from the main parties. In this connection, learned senior counsel has referred to the departmental clarifications reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T. (T.33). The clarification was on the question whether a sub-contractor was supposed to take out a registration and discharge tax liability if there was a total sub-contract of the service. The clarification was to the effect that the sub-contractor was not liable to take a registrat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the period 16-7-2001 to 30-9-2005; the one issued to M/s. Sea Port Logistics Ltd. demanded Service Tax of over ₹ 4.4 crores for the same period; and the one issued to M/s. SICAL Logistics demanded over ₹ 8.4 crores towards Service Tax for the same period. The Service Tax amounts demanded by learned Commissioner from the appellants for the same services, according to leaned senior Counsel are ₹ 1.07 crores, ₹ 56.75 lakhs and ₹ 1.51 crores respectively. It is the case of the appellants that these amounts are already covered by the demands raised on M/s. South India Corporation Ltd., M/s. Sea Port Logistics Ltd. and M/s. SICAL Logistics. The same plea of double taxation has been raised in respect of the remaining ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
