Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (8) TMI 417

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hout discussing the nature of the transaction and materials on record, the Assessing Officer had made certain addition to the income of the assessee, the same would have been considered erroneous by any appellate authority as being violative of the principles of natural justice which require that the authority must indicate the reasons for an adverse order. We find no reason why the same view should not be taken when an order is against the interests of the revenue. As a matter of fact such orders are prejudicial to the interests of both the parties, because even the assessee is deprived of the benefit of a positive finding in his favour, though he may have sufficiently established his case. In view of the foregoing, it can safely be sai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner of Income Tax(A)-15, Chennai dated 18.11.2015 passed consequent to order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s.263 of the Act pertaining to assessment year 2003-04. Since issues involved in both the Assessee s appeals are common in nature, these appeals are clubbed together, heard together, disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. Originally, the AO while framing the assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Act vide order dated 31.03.2006 allowed professional charges incurred for the issue of optionally fully convertible debentures at `40 lakhs. According to CIT in his order dated 28.03.2008 passed u/s.263 of the Act observed that the said expenditure is a capital expenditure in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Br .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s. CIT reported in 60 ITR 52 SC and the judgment of Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Vs. L T Infrastructure Development Projects Ltd. in TC No.87/2010 dated 03.06.2013. 3.1 Regarding invoking the provisions of the section 263 of the Act, in our opinion, this is covered against the assessee by judgment in the case of Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Ltd Vs. UOI reported in AIR 1976 SC 1785. It is settled law that while making assessment on assessee, the ITO acts in a quasi-judicial capacity. An assessment order is amenable to appeal by the assessee and to revision by the Commissioner under Sections 263 and 264. Therefore, a reasoned order on a substantial issue is legally necessary. The judgments .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed proceeds on incorrect assumption of facts or incorrect application of law. In the same category fall orders passed without applying the principles of natural justice or without application of mind. (iii) The order passed by the Assessing Officer is a stereotype order which simply accepts what the assessee has stated in his return or where he fails to make the requisite enquiries or examine the genuineness of the claim which is called for in the circumstances of the case. In view of this, exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 of the Act by CIT is justified. However, on merit, the issue in dispute with regard to the expenditure incurred for issue of debenture was come before the Madras High Court in the case of CI Vs. FIRST LEASING C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ITR 577 (Cal), whereunder it is held that there is no distinction between discount and premium, the discount on debentures as well as the premium payable on actual redemption on debentures in future years and the expenditure incurred for issue of such debentures are all held to be revenue expenditure, entitled to be spread over the period of debentures and consequently, allowable as deduction in a particular assessment year. In view of this on merit, the issue is remitted back to the file of ld. Assessing Officer to decide afresh in the light of above judgement of jurisdictional High Court. 4. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th J .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates