2016 (8) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ainst Order-in-Appeal dated 19.01.2010, which upheld the Order-in-Original dated 24.03.2009 in terms of which customs duty demand of Rs. 3,45,435/- was confirmed along with interest and penalties.  The appellant had imported and cleared goods under EPCG licence and  the appellant (licence-holder) was required to fulfil export obligation and other conditions prescribed in the licence and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rates the findings contained in the impugned order.  4.  We have gone through the impugned order and the appeal papers.  We find that the appellant had not submitted the evidence of fulfilment of export obligations to the Asst. Commissioner directly nor did it produce the EODC from the licensing authority within the stipulated period.  Indeed, while the stipulated period expir .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X